|
Pentascope
faces sack in Nigeria
Dutch
Pentascope is about to be issued the red card by its
Nigerian employers reports IT Edge news crew.
The Nigerian government may relieve Pentascope of its
service before year-end if it accepts the counseling of an
influential group within the National Council on
Privatisation (NCP). Nigeria's Vice President, Atiku
Abubakar, chairs the NCP. Pentascope, appointed Nitel's
contract managers less than two years ago, was attacked
recently by Abubakar for its inability to turn Nitel's
fortune around as anticipated. The Vice President's
stringent criticism capped series of attacks in the last
three weeks against the Rein Zwolsman led management team.
Incidentally, it was the NCP with Abubakar as chairman
that approved the appointment of Pentascope in spite of
disapproval of some highly vocal critics that the Dutch
company did not meet the prescribed guidelines to manage
Nitel.
Under the guidelines spelt out by privatisation midwife
Bureau for Public Enterprises (BPE), a management
consultant must have had experience in managing a network
of one million lines and must have successful track record
of growing networks in a developing country. Pentascope
had no such experience.
However, removing Pentascope is only one out of three
options Aso Rock (seat of power in Nigeria) is
considering. The two other options are to expedite action
on the sale of Nitel by March 2005 or tolerate Petanscope
until its contract expires in the hope that the Dutch team
would improve Nitel's fortunes. The last option is the
least appealing and it is unlikely to enjoy any support.
"Government would rather prefer that Nitel is sold out
early next year," a BPE official said. Four BPE members
are on the Board of Nitel.
At a press briefing to clean up its image in Lagos, some
days back, and fight what it regarded as a "campaign of
calumny against it, Pentascope claimed it was able to
reach an understanding with the BPE during the bid. It
convinced the BPE that its relationship with the KPN Royal
Dutch Telecom was sufficient to make it win the bid
against others at that time. Pentascope was at the media
briefing with many documents to defend its case and
blaming its inability to meet its set targets so far on
"resistance from many quarters."
But obviously, the highly critical Lagos press was not
impressed. 'Why has Nitel remained a moribund organisation
in the face of stiff competition and what defence does
Pentascope have against charges that its mismanagement of
Nitel had made the telco record a loss of N40 billion?'
Pentascope was not exactly forthcoming but owned up that
it had insufficient information on Nitel when it signed
the three years "farm-out management contract with the BPE."
Chief of Planning Josbert Kester who claimed that
Pentascope's original business plan for Nitel has been
undermined by "bureaucratic bottlenecks and lack of funds"
led Penstascope's team at the briefing.
The Dutch team complained that the change of BPE
leadership at the commencement of its contract killed the
initial rapport it had with the former BPE leadership
headed by Mallam Nasir el Rufai, now Minister of the
Federal Capital Territory, in a subtle hint at the lack of
rapprochement between it and the new BPE leadership under
Dr Julius Bala.
Besides, decision making processes at Nitel are
considerably slower compared with what obtains at MTN and
V-Mobile, Kester told his audience blaming Pentascope's
inefficiency on extraneous factors that also include an
absence of an Executive Committee as prescribed by the
contract to manage Nitel's day-to-day that meets only once
in a month and which has been dissolved twice; November
2003 and January 2004. There was a three-month gap before
the new board was constituted and in which period
everything was at a standstill within the telco and at a
time when its rivals were busy expanding their networks to
increase their market share.
But Nitel's biggest competition is not from its rivals. It
is in the words of Kester, "financing." While MTN has been
able to raise N139 billion (about ($1 billion) since 2001
and V-Mobile has been able to put some N98 billion (about
$700 million) into its network, Nitel pitiable response
has been a N2.8 billion (about $20 million) debt on its
balance sheet. A N14 billion (about $100 million) credit
facility for turnaround projects was suspended by the BPE
in a curious reasoning that it was not in the place of a
contract management team overseeing the affairs of a
public telco in transition to execute projects financed by
loans that would increase the liabilities of Nitel's
prospective owners. The N14 billion would have been used
to partly finance the 250,000 line expansion in Lagos and
the rollout of other 750,000 CDMA lines in several cities
including Lagos which was to get 150,000 of these lines.
It would appear Pentascope's argument is not striking the
right cord within government circle and where it matters
most. "I do not think Pentascope has anything to add again
to Nitel. I think we should all be man enough to admit
that we made a mistake bringing in the Dutch," a top
government official and a member of the NCP told IT Edge
in a phone conversation from Abuja three days after
Pentascope had its interaction with the media in Lagos.
The official ruled out the likelihood of Aad Loois, the
suspended CEO of M-tel (Nitel's mobile arm), returning.
But the senior BPE official denied that there were plans
within the NCP to sack Pentascope before December. The BPE
and NCP, he said, were working with the Ministry of
Communications (Nitel's owner ministry) to fine-tune the
original contractual agreement between Pentascope and the
BPE. Few months after the current Minister of
Communications Chief Cornelius Adebayo assumed duty, he
faulted the terms of contract as unduly tilted to favour
Pentascope. "The minister wondered how a contract would
give so much powers to a contractor that had no commitment
outside bringing in so-called technical skill to manage an
enterprise owned by over 100 million people," an aide of
the minister told IT Edge.
Pentascope's entry certainly did not win it any friends
and since it took over, it seems to have lost the
understanding of those who endorsed its contract. One of
its arch-critics remain the Senior Staff Association of
Utilities, Statutory Corporations and Government Companies
(SSAUSCGOC), an umbrella body that includes Nitel's
workers led by its President, Mrs. Nkiru Peace Obiajulu
and General Secretary Mr. Chubby Nwagbara. The association
has severally condemned the deal with Pentascope as
non-transparent. Recently, it took up the battle against
Pentascope afresh accusing it of being inexperienced and
incompetent in managing Nitel in separate letters
published by several print media and addressed to both
President Olusegun Obasanjo and Nitel's CEO Zwolsman.
The workers alleged that Nitel lines had depleted from
450,000 in 2003 when Pentascope took over to 288,000.
Further still, it accused Pentascope of financial
recklessness that has left the once buoyant Nitel in debt.
Besides, there are accusations of reckless spending on
public relations. A media meeting at Sheraton Hotel, Lagos
to announce Pentascope's plans to expand the Lagos network
by 250,000 lines some months back reportedly got the Media
Consultant Richard Ikiebe N50 million richer. Ikiebe's new
brief to launder Pentascope's image is costing the Dutch
team more "and Nitel would pay for this unnecessary
jamboree," one Nitel official said in Lagos.
But in defence, Pentascope is accusing the SSAUSCGOC of
being used by "those who have ulterior motives for Nitel
and whose personal interest is threatened by our presence
[Pentascope]." Kester led his team in Lagos to give a
written response thus: "The actual operational result over
2003 was a loss of N5.1 billion, less than the projections
[in its business plan, Pentascope's projection was a N7
billion loss for 2003] In addition, Nitel made provisions
for unfunded pensions (N6.2 billion) and a write-off for
long outstanding debts (N7.8 billion) on its Profit and
Loss account. This was necessary to clean-up the balance
sheet in view of Nitel's planned privatisation."
How far this defence would go to win Pentascope public
sympathy or the support of Nitel workers is uncertain as
accusations fly around. What is certain is that the
Presidency would decide on the fate of Pentascope before
Rein Zwolswan, CEO of Nitel and Vincent Maduka, chairman
of Nitel take leave of office for Christmas.
More…..
Back To
Top
|