|
Skirting round the big deals
By Segun Oruame
Leo Stan Ekeh is not
getting as popular as the Zinox brand these days. At least
not in the computer hardware business. Now, you see Leo
Stan Ekeh within a steadily rising profile of a financial
player since he became chairman of Assurance Bank that has
now merged with other banks to become Astral Bank. Ekeh
had become synonymous with the vending of the big names
like Apple, Compaq and HP.
|
“It is cheaper to produce a
unit of Dell PC than to produce a Zinox or Omatek
and even costlier to produce one unit of Unitec or
Beta systems.” |
Nowadays, you see
him on the pages of newspapers more as a banker and an
insurer. One October morning in his office at Victoria
Island, where you could get a view of the rough patchy
roads on the Island, Leo was telling IT Edge
that his pains are not that Zinox does not sell as much as
he would have desired but that the sales margins just do
not add up to all the energy and investment put into
building the brand.
|
“Indigenous promoters
stand a better chance in the competition if all
local PC makers invest in a single factory to churn
out systems [and ]concentrate on building their
brands.” |
Leo should know,
as he is fondly called in business circle. About two years
ago when he veered into local production of PCs and
notebooks, he created a bomb with the brand name Zinox.
The Nigerian company had struck partnership with Mercer of
South Africa, considered a technical coup in the hardware
business; Mercer is a South African success story for
local manufacture of computers.
A Zinox/Mercer
partnership had all the ingredients to turn the tide in
Nigeria’s fast growing IT market against the foreign
brands Leo had promoted through Technology Distribution
Limited, a company he formed years ago. The new Zinox
brand was not underestimated by the big brands and they
have been proved right. Months later, an aggressive sales
drive and several road shows had helped stamped Zinox in
the mind of corporate Nigeria.
But Leo would say
not much patronage has matched the high degree of
acceptance of the brand. If brand acceptance could mean
high purchasing power of an average Nigerian, high-level
infrastructure business climate and heavy public-sector
patronage, then Zinox would be riding a horse. “There is
no money in the economy,” says Leo in his office as he
flips through the papers. “Those driving indigenous
production are doing it out of patriotism and nothing
more” he added. Zinox has become a Nigerian identity for
the triumph of indigenous entrepreneurship in the face of
a turbulent economy. If GDP were higher, most Nigerians
would have a Zinox for keep. The economy is
under-nourished with a GDP that is under $400 (about N5,
200) and it would take most Nigerians about 12 years to
acquire the cheapest PC model on the Zinox stable. The IT
market still remains extremely small for the country of
over 130 million people with yearly sales of all local and
foreign brands combined not exceeding 150,000.
In spite of this,
there have been exciting developments in the IT sector.
Indeed, the entire sub-region and not just Nigeria, is
undergoing rapid changes in the national telecom sector.
There is an impressive growth in the uptake of mobile
telephones just as there has been a significant, though
still unimpressive, Internet (notably via wireless links),
penetration. This, undoubtedly, is having substantial
impact on the ability of the ICT marketplace to make
demand for PCs and notebooks in both the private and
public sectors. Large population means a critical mass
good for any business. Although a large percentage of this
is impoverished, the potential for volume purchase of PCs
is not completely eroded since government remains the
greatest spender. A public sector re-structuring tied to
IT would mean high demand for PCs and notebooks just as
similar policy thrust in other areas such as education
would mean setting aside huge funds for hardware and
software deployment.
But the ability of
local PC makers to tap into these opportunities is
hindered by a mix of factors that makes rival foreign
brands more attractive in an increasingly sensitive
market. Nearly 60% of consumers in the current market of
less than 200,000 systems need more than just boxes. The
telecom and banking environments, for in stance, need high
grade, intelligent systems that can execute
mission-critical tasks in real-time.
Only the foreign
brands appear to be positioned to meet this needs in terms
of volume and the inherent cost-impact on a unit of a
system. HP global production is in excess of millions as
is Dell. Demands in Nigeria and the entire West African
sub-region for a year is still lower than what Dell
produces in a single day. But the big brands are here
because green markets have the potential to explode demand
for computer hardware. Besides, they have the global
stamp, a good market-weapon to push competition flat to
the wall.
While Zinox,
Omatek, Unitec and Beta Computers are pushing only
thousands and struggling with building a formidable market
image, Dell and other foreign brands have capacity to push
millions and are only being slowed down by the size of the
market. The cost-advantage is that it is far more cheaper
to produce a unit of Dell PC than to produce a Zinox or
Omatek and even more costlier to produce one unit of
Unitec or Beta systems. Zinox and Omatek are the most
successful local brands and naturally, incur lower cost on
a unit since they have higher volume than other local PC
makers. It is a game of volume.
Like Zinox, Omatek
has enjoyed much market favour and a publicly celebrated
Federal Government endorsement that has helped to sour its
brand visibility. But the strength of the two brands (Zinox
and Omatek) combined is grossly insignificant to withstand
the grip of HP and others in a market that lusts after
foreign labels. Both companies are led by strong-willed
personalities with intimidating streaks of successes in
the IT sector. But selling own-brands in an environment
with eyes for things branded abroad is a different
challenge. Every knows Leo, he has dictated the pace of IT
marketing in the last few years. Florence Seriki is almost
becoming an icon in the mould of Carly Fiona of HP. But
the brands they sell still have miles to cover to leverage
against the advantages enjoyed by their foreign rivals.
People will not keep personalities in their homes or
offices, they will keep brands. Brands reflect complex
market dynamics and not just the personalities associated
with them.
HP does not
manufacture PC or laptops. It has long outsourced such
tasks to some factories in Asia. Dell and others do the
same thing. They do not bear the overheads that go with
running a factory and are less bother with the job
scouting for partners for motherboards, keyboards,
processors and the likes. For Omatek and the rest, a
typical business day starts with discussions on supply of
motherboards from some Asian partners. “There are numerous
challenges you face in this business. One important
challenge is volume. The demand is not sufficient for the
kind of price concession the older brands get from those
factories in Asia,” says Seriki, or Flo, as she is fondly
referred to in the industry
Dell and others
are concentrating energy on selling their logos while the
heirs to the local market have to contend with both the
production and marketing ends of the business. It is a
distraction that is unhealthy and would prove too costly
in the long run. Should things remain as they are, the
local promoters would only be skirting round major deals
in any competitive bids. Zinox thinks indigenous promoters
stand a better chance in the competition if all local PC
makers invest in a single factory to churn out systems to
allow them concentrate on building their brands.
It is a good
proposition to all local PC makers but they doubt its
practicability. Not much good has been made of this in
telecom, where the dynamics of the industry makes it
compelling for players to be more pre-dispose to sharing
infrastructures. “It would be good for such a thing to
happen but you know Nigeria,” says Managing Director of
Unitec Davies Mirila. Unitec’s history shares some traits
with the idea of a common homegrown factory. There are
over five promoters behind Unitec and even Leo was part of
the initial arrangements. At the time, the promoters were
keen about building a Nigerian PC. Perhaps, a bit of
elasticity in the original vision would have helped to
re-design Unitec into a single factory for different
brands and not one brand.
All that is now
history as Mirila puts it. The market is bound to explode
as the experience in mobile telephony has shown. The price
of PC is crashing globally and in the green markets, there
are bound to be fresh orders. Price and ability to drive
volume are as crucial as the price of talk in telecom.
Public funding for IT related activities is growing even
if at a slow pace, there are more private-sector led
initiatives with high IT consumption rate across the
entire sub-region just as there are increasing number of
donor-funded projects on IT. All these mean one thing:
More orders for computer systems. How well the local logos
would play depends on how well they harness their
potentials and overcome their challenges.
Even Leo and Flo
agree that the market could be persuaded by an appeal to
sense of nationalism but long-time patronage is not a
function of patriotism but of price and quality. The
Japanese proved this point in the US. They taught Ford and
other US auto-manufacturers that market acceptability is
not always about national pride but about individuals’
taste and the companies able to meet their needs.
Americans turned their backs on US cars and went for the
small and stylishly designed Japanese cars. Now, the
Americans auto-companies are aping the Japanese to beat
the Red Men from the East.
More…..
Back To
Top
|